CONTROVERSY ABOUT MIASMS AMONG HOMEOPATH.By Dr. Subir Basu
- DR. SUBIR BASU, 91 STEEL PARK. DURGAPUR.
- Oct 3, 2015
- 6 min read

WHO WAS RIGHT??(MIASM RIDDLE)
CONTROVERSY ABOUT MIASM AMONG HOMEOPATH,BECAUSE NOT A SINGLE HOMOEOPATH UNDERSTAND THE MIASM IN A LIGHT OF PHYSICS OR A SCIENTIFIC WAY.
I THINK AND DECLARING THE THEORY OF MIASM , IN VIEW OF MODERN PHYSICS.
WE CAN AVOID MANY UNRESOLVED PART OF HOMOEOPATHY IF WE CONNECT MIASM TO PHYSICS.
MIASM IS CLASSIFIED IN TWO PATTERNS : FUNTIONAL AND STRUCTURAL.
FUNCTIONAL IS THE CAUSE , HAHNEMANN CALLED IT PSORA, AND IT IS SIMILAR TO THE FRICTIONAL FORCE. IT AGAIN CAN BE A TRIGGER , TO THE FUNDAMENTAL FORCE. &
STRUCTURAL : (TWO ARE THERE) :
1) CAUSE OF SUDDEN ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE VARIATION AND ITS SUPPRESSION IN A LIVING ORGANISM IS EQUIVALENT TO SYCOSIS MIASM,
2) OTHER IS THE :CAUSE OF VARIATION OF THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE & ITS SUPPRESSION IN A LIVING ORGANISM ( SYPHILITIC MIASM IN HOMOEOPATHY).
THERE FORE , PSORA=FRICTIONAL FORCE, SYCOSIS=ELECTROMAGNEMTIC FORCE, SYPHILIS=GRAVITATIONAL FORCE.
******I AM THE FIRST MAN DECLARING THE ABOVE IDEA IN FRONT WORLD COMMUNITY TO THINK THE CHRONIC DISEASE AS ABOVE WAYTO GET A SPECIFIC CONCEPTION ABOUT CHRONIC DISEASE.
(SIMPLE DISCUSSION IS GIVEN LAST PARAGRAPH OF THIS POST.)
****It is continuous debate among Homeopathic community without any consensus to solve the riddle the miasm theory in Homeopathy. Some dedicated soul who present in every field, never do a critic study and analyze any given issue. There are many views about miasm, ranging from divine punishment for sins to quantum theory of physics. Some of ideas in between, Astrology, bacterial/ viral infections, chemical toxin, vaccination, constitution, sexual transmitted diseases and the list go on. But it will be absurd that any amount of discussion about miasm, without any chronic disease is absurd. And that was the Hahnemann’s chief objective view to introduce miasm in homeopathy. Even some disciple of Hahnemann, Dr. Richard Huges never believed about miasm theory, and Dr. J.T. Kent was a firm believer, where as Dr. C. Herring was in opinion sometime yes and some time no. The question of introducing miasm theory is highly controversial not only with other skeptics (Allopath) but in Homeopathic community itself. That is the reason we have to think deeply who was right?? How we will solve the riddle?
Discussions:
Author: Hahnemann himself tried till his last work for unification of chronic disease and organon of medicine, as there are many differences we find when we study the two books separately and the funny thing is that the writer was same.
After studying separately both the books OM and CD , there are at least 10 major differences,inspite effort taken by Hahnemann to unify to his last edition but mostly could not unify that properly , you can search and get it to another post available in this blog.
Advises from one eminent Homeopath: Search similarities... ask why did Hahnemann wrote sixth edition apart from the introduction of LM scale...why did not he satisfied with his dilution technique..Concept of miasms has been misinterpreted by his so called followers....read Hahnemann and dudgeon lectures to understand.
AuthorThank for your advice, you are telling your own ideas with an angle like many homeopaths tell,’ study Hahnemann more and more you will get your all answers,’ Yes Hahnemann’s view may be correct to somebody and may not to others(skeptics) or who views Homeopathy from some other angles. It was the basic idea of theory of relativity to see a space from different angles. Unless we connect Homeopathy with the Basic laws of modern physics it is just simply follow an idea like a blind. With respect of time we have to upgrade the Homeopathy with views of modern science. Hahnemann also tried to unify both the Organon and chronic disease with respect of contemporary scientific period and ultimately changed to 50 milisimal scales. There is a large gap yet lying for unification and of course a difficult job, as thousand cores of rupees already spent, a huge number of scientist are working day and night for unification of the basic physical forces of quantum physics, and similarly it is a job for us to work more to reduce the difference (Unification) of the both (OM & CD) in a more comprehensible and scientific way. In my view for every case if we indicate our finger towards Hahnemann(Origin) then a stagnant condition will arise, and we will be in same position( frog in a well).
Opinion of an eminent Homeopath: Hahnemann was far ahead from his age. What he thought and proved so far the scientific methods available then. Try to understand the concepts of Hahnemann first and then correlate with modern science you will astonish by the foresight of Hahnemann. And so far the scientific experimentations are concerned regarding homeopathy it is still not being conducted very seriously though enough money is being spent by government. To prove homeopathy scientifically one should be a scientist and homeopath as well. I hope one day the scientific bent homeopathy will be understood well.
Author:In my view Hahnemann was in advanced in thinking (far ahead) compare to contemporary time.18th century specially in western part of earth they were more materialistic, and modern physics had a profound influence on almost all aspect of human society and naturally it was changing the conditions of life on earth, and because of that there is an unsuspected limitation of classical ideas, and has necessitated a radical revision of many of our basic concepts and in that area Hahnemann explore a relationship between the concepts of modern physics and the basic ideas in the philosophical tradition of the eastern part of the earth which was available in earth many years before of Hahnemann, even now a days the quantum theory and relativity theory both force us to the world very much in the way a Hindu , Buddhist , the Taoist of china , or eastern mystics observed that. Only thing is that Hahnemann properly observed it and tried to mix the materialistic and philosophical world in the field of medicine, and made an index his all job in a disciplined way. With Practical experiment and experience he tried to evolve a fact, with a great patience. For that of course he deserve salute, and as after 200 years passed and telling about his that he is far ahead, is just an exaggeration of thinking about somebody, as everything was already available and that (far ahead) thinking extend such a position, some people putting Hahnemann in place of God, how ridiculous, as homeopathy is a religion not a science.
Comments