Organon of medicine and chronic disease ( the technical and scientific differences in thinking)

IMG_20150927_082503

The differences mostly I observed, while a comparing study of the two books organon of medicine and Chronic diseases,In organon of medicine we see the following observations,(OM)The sickness was due to derangement of vital force.

1. The only one sick vital force shows it deranged manifestations through mentally and physically.

2. In organon cure is achieved through symptoms similarity

3. In organon Aph80 F/N ,he denounced labeling any sickness with the word disease but he called them an individual is suffering a disease like condition

4. Hahnemann instructed for extremely diluted minimum dose.

5. In organon it was single remedy (aph272, 273) is permitted to be used,

and was given infrequently often waiting for reaction.

1. In organon selection of remedy based on totality of symptoms.

2. In organon it the sick vital force is getting cure with the help of competing remedies.

But in the Chronic Disease(CD) book we see difference instructions

1. In chronic disease it is the miasm which derange an individual to a sick condition.

2. In chronic disease book Hahnemann mentioned that three culprits Psora, Sycosis, and syphilis are the causing agents forms a disease conditions.

3. In chronic disease we see the treatment lies on the domain of antimiasmatic remedy.

4. And in chronic disease he embarrassed about the specific name of disease but the title of his new book consisting over 1600 pages was named as chronic disease.

5. In chronic disease it sometime closer to mother tincture repeated often.

6. In chronic disease medicines are repeated often either in alteration with other remedies or same medicine in varied dilution.

7. In CD it is evolution of miasm for an individual who is on sick condition.

8. Here medicine are almost specific, sulphur -psora, Thuja-sycosis, Mercurius-syphlitic miasm.

Hahnemann continued his Endeavour to unify the chronic disease finding in the new version of organon till his death. As it was best and scientific to treat an individual by unify both the ideas specially to treat a chronic case. But if the conception is not clear there some confusion is arise. Most of the time Hahnemann overcome and very few homoeopaths found it wrong because Hahnemann tried to put experimented results in the both CD, and OM. This is one of the reasons Homoeopathy is called the science of experimentation.

Unless we have a clear concept the assumption about the different laws or the theory it is very difficult to unify both the book and there will be increasing confusions, in the system and among the homoeopath. A homoeopathic physician should be an unprejudiced observer to his patients and to his system also. If he has no clear scientific ideas about his system he seldom becomes an unprejudiced observer. Though by introducing 50 millicimal scales Hahnemann mostly solve the potency selection controversy, which shows his great dynamic scientific role for unification and to solves some differences between OM and CD.

Unless we solve the assumptions of the origin of chronic diseases in a scientific way , it is very difficult to solve the above differences and the unification between two thinking of OM,and CD will be a difficult one

#particlewavedualityprinciple #trituration #potentisation #succussion