Prejudiced thought in homoeopathic theory:

Dr Surbir Basu in his clinic.

Homoeopath mostly ardent that what Hahnemann said are all correct, Even Hahnemann was in confusion in many places . Dr JT kent thought fifth edition is final and in his book Lecture on Homoeopathic Philosophy, lectureX , Subject: Materialism In Medicine” “…..the oldest practitioner of pure homoeopathy finds nothing in to change.” Because of the strict principle , and orthodox thinking the homoeopathic conception of Hahnemann cannot be changed. Kent worked so hard on patients , and spent his maximum time how to achieve cure and he bound to do different observations and experimentations with his patients and as a result we get the Kent’s 12 th observations based on 5th edition of Organon of medicine.

The funniest thing is that Hahnemann in 6th Edition of Organon of Medicine, changed many things , and while supporting the law of therapeutics in Aph 28 and 29 he used the word “this highly PROBABLE explanations” of law of therapeutics. The question is if the chief law of homoeopathy stand on a probable explanation, then how a total system Can be erected if the base is on a probability.

Some blind, prejudiced homoeopath (self declared Classical) do not agree to that , they will be shouting in same tone that what ever Hahnemann said, it is the authority and can’t be changed, if anybody speak against , just ignore him or through him in dustbin.

Homoeopathy is a science and it is dynamic, and there must be up gradation and we should acknowledge that. Unless we study in light of modern science there will be no use that will increase the confusions, and acceptance of homoepathy will be more difficult and as a homoeopath we will be facing more confusions in future.

#particlewavedualityprinciple #trituration #potentisation #succussion